Combine Resampling Options? [PLAYER][SUGGESTION]

[Nepster]

Currently there are three options doing very similar things: In all cases they resize images using non-integral zoom factors, interpolating the colors to create a decent resized image. They are:
- "Use Smooth Resampling in Menus": Resizes the menu screen to window size.
- "Use Smooth Resampling in Game": Resizes the level area to window size.
- "High-Quality Minimap": Shrinks the level area to the size of the minimap to be displayed there.

All three options stem from one and the same problem: The interpolation process is complicated and creates lags on weaker computers. So I expect that users either enable all or disable all of the three options. Therefore having all three seems redundant and I suggest combining them into one single option "Use Continuous Zoom".

Is there anyone who wouldn't be happy with this change?

[ccexplore]

Some people might also avoid non-integral zoom factors specifically for the level area so they can be more sure where exactly the terrain pixels are?  I haven't seen what the non-integral zoom looks like so maybe it's usually fine even for that case.

The minimap option also isn't merely a matter of non-integral vs integral zoom.  It sounds like it's a choice between the original-style minimap versus one that actually looks more like the level preview.  It is perhaps plausible that a nostalgia-minded player may choose to keep the old-style minimap, but opt into non-integral zooms for the other two since those don't change the overall styles of what's being displayed.

Anyhow, those are reasons I can conceive of for someone to not set all 3 options the same way, though probably not many people overall.

[namida]

There is a different level of impact. Resampling in-game takes a slightly higher toll than on the main menu (where the scroller exists), and much higher than on preview / postview screens (which only need to be resampled once at the start, and then again during the fadeout - the latter of which was recoded so that the duration is the same and it just skips frames if the CPU isn't keeping up). High-quality minimap, on the other hand, has a HUGE impact, more than either of the others (not to mention that if in-game smoothing is also enabled, it compounds with this to some extent). The in-game smooth resampling has the added issue of that, as ccexplore mentions (albeit for different reasons), it can render the physics a bit unclear; so the most common preference (assuming one's PC can handle it) would in fact likely be "high quality minimap on, in-game smooth resampling off, don't care either way about menu although on does look a little bit nicer" - which would no longer be available with your suggestion.

Using these options does not allow non-integer zoom in game (unless you've added this more recently), and lack of them does not prevent it in the menus. So your suggested name is also completely misleading.

[Nepster]

Thanks for the further input. As all of these options produce considerable lag on my computer, I can't really compare their impacts on performence. This is also the reason why I didn't even know what they do exactly .
I haven't added non-integer zoom and all these resampling options still work exactly as you implemented them.

[Nepster]

For the newest experimental version, I combined the two resampling options, but kept the high-quality minimap separate.

If anyone has issues with this set-up, please speak up.